Home Local 2012 Legislative Policy Society Economy Social Culture Sport Incidents Health Education Indian Ocean International National Letters from readers Zot Zinfos Zannonces Pictures Contact your Listings Job Job Application Car Real Estate North West Real Estate South East Dating (H / F) Dating (F / F) Dating (H / H) Meeting (couple) Other Animals Audio Video Computers Furniture Music Phones Clothing Boating Business Opportunities Your Info Letters to your Contacts
The National Institute of Health Surveillance (VS) publishes catering wien a study conducted between 2005 and 2006 at the Meeting on mosquito used in young children during the chikungunya epidemic repellents date. These data show that during epidemics, catering wien IR3535 and citriodiol have been widely used to protect the child under 2 1/2 years and this practice was well tolerated. These misuses necessitate an impact assessment and adequate information for healthcare professionals and parents on the protection catering wien of young children vector.
During the chikungunya epidemic on Réunion Island in 2005-2006, the recommendations on measures of mosquito repellent protection to the attention of young children have varied. The group of tropical pediatrics and professionals in early childhood on the island conducted a survey on the use of insect repellent and mosquito nets for children. catering wien The target population was children under 30 months of staying on the island during the chikungunya epidemic. The survey was conducted face-to-face with parents in MCH centers and nurseries of the four main areas of the island from 15/03/09 to 15/04/2009. Occurrence of side effects in the infant result, 382 children less than 30 months (including PMI 219, 116 nursery and pre-47 respondents (21 children and 26 children nursing students consultants)), at least one skin repellent was applied in 74% of these infants to protect against mosquito bites during the day during the chikungunya epidemic. Main repellent substances were IR3535 (77%) and citriodiol (17%). These products were applied catering wien more than once a day (on the face, arms and legs) in 79% of children. Skin mild side effects (7.9%) and allergic general (1.8%) were observed. Three children catering wien had febrile seizures after application catering wien of insect repellent (1.1%), catering wien without catering wien accountability to these products catering wien can be determined. Thought to lead to the protection catering wien of young children Factors favoring the use of insect repellent product in children were age over 6 months old, father occupation (children of low family socioeconomic status were less protected the important price of these products is an obstacle), an accommodation with garden and a residence located east of the island. Seventy percent (70%) of children were also protected by nets during the day. Use of non-recommended practices were identified in terms of age limit of use, number of daily applications and duration of use. In addition to the protection screen, the use of insect repellents may have contributed to the low prevalence of chikungunya in this population. Further studies are needed to confirm catering wien this.
Leptospirosis: 32 cases and one death since the beginning of the year - 26/05/2014
Why kill mosquito, scare, destroy larvae babies catering wien as the darkest hours of our history .... it is not in him as the shark?? is on when the life of his family is at stake, the beautiful eco-friendly principles such as masks fall!
1 post right ..... Enough! hundreds of thousands of baby mosquito so cruelly torn affection catering wien of their innocent parents .... STOP THIS MASSACRE! mosquitoes were present on Earth long before the arrival of man, we must give them this planet! by cons if a mosquito bites a shark or a shark eats a mosquito .... ... what to do? cruel dilemma .. but sooooo ... eureka! MUST MAKE THE WORLD IN BACTERIA ... there zétaient there before anyone else! is hyper-top-cool mâânnn it, right?
2.Posté by macadam cowboy on 22/02/2011 1:22 p.m. Devil, the complexity of nature is obviously difficult to understand! Every action catering wien on the chain of living has hardly controllable impacts, it is a fact. Does this mean that you should never do anything to protect a human imminent peril? Certainly not. Does this mean we should eliminate preventively this planet any animal or plant potentially embarrassing or dangerous for a human being? Much less collateral damage might well be more dangerous than
No comments:
Post a Comment