Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Wunderlist charlton house - simple thing. It

The year 2011. Whose year?
In animals not about me, about technology. With the tenth here is clear - planšečių, or more precisely - the iPad years. The most notable and successful basically new (what, that such a thing of Moses the Ten Commandments carved) items. And what vienuoliktieji? And what new, just started a decade of the twenty-first century?
I hope this will be a "synchronization" year. Not in a broad sense, "clouds" (who does not know what it means), and just sync, when all the data is accessible from any device, which they are required. Documents, books, movies, charlton house music, and all lists (works and so on.), Slides. I do not think we need to move everything to the Internet, as proposed by the ChromeOS maximalists. I think that nothing needs to move at all - just take the opportunity to communicate and coordinate copies. Working with the spot data is always faster and more reliable work directly for Web services, but it is imperative that data is always available wherever they are needed.
I have two well-functioning examples: Dropbox and Wunderlist. Dropbox works reliably in most cases, but a couple of times was coming online problems. Two disadvantages of service: 1) difficult for other programs to use this service as the basis for synchronization (available from my Dropbox synchronization uses only three: 1Password, The Hit List, and Things), and 2) it is a free version of the resource runs out quickly if it has tied them to work.
Wunderlist charlton house - simple thing. It's just a list of the works, which each change is automatically synchronized over the Internet. Completely smooth. It should run the entire program, but because I do not fully understand the reasons synchronization successfully operates only very, very rarely (both here and list). Apple's MobileMe and iDisk service, program, which synchronizes data with Google services - all is not working either very slow or lose data fragments, or synchronization does not cover all program / document features and options.
Ideally, every program I could I choose, do I need a copy in the cloud or not. Maybe what put asterisks or click "Save charlton house and Sync" instead of only "Save". Everything else should be carried out automatically and invisibly.
I is similar to the operating system, not to the program function. If each program charlton house will develop your synchronization system, we will have trouble. One will work better (as Wunderlist), others less, but on the third attempt charlton house to join Dropbox or other service shoulders. It would be better to extend the same operating system charlton house file system of writing, adding there and invisible to the consumer, but well-functioning synchronization.
Only OS-level sync this year is likely to be no. MacOS AppStore with future programs, common to all computers is a step in the great thing (especially for families and people with multiple computers), but only 10% of the work. I wonder if Lion will have more synchronization options charlton house ... maybe? Microsoft, of course, are already working on Windows 7 shift, but whether it will be something better than the current Internet quite faint storage integration, more suspense.
In short, in 2011 we would like to wait for reliable "invisible" synchronization solutions to be used by all programs on computers, phones and planšetėse. Of course, and the browser, but not only the browser.
In further speculation do not feel like coming down, but would guess that this decade the world of technology should be designed charlton house to win over people's attention away from the television. Other wars, even if they are ongoing, are already basically win - books, news, games, and other studies have already digitized, or rapidly moving towards full digitization. With a computer and Internet facility has successfully compete only TV.
TV holds a majority of their leisure, and along with it, and billions of advertising, such as attention and a great cost a lot of money. charlton house Television is different - more passive, more entertainment, inferior image quality charlton house - so even spinning broadcasts digital still need to do a lot of work on the TV and computers and the internet would be consistent.
The test took place, but most of them - the cable TV market as major broadcasters to not make sense to improve what and earning money. I guess that's the least of them and to be expected. Apple and Google TV with your games started, I think, only after fully convinced that honest cooperation with televisions will not - this is enemy territory.
Today, Apple TV or Google TV looks like tests aim to host home-baked apple pie conquer food market, but in the future these tests of "hobby" (S. Jobs's words) is really turning into a serious charlton house undertaking. It seems to me that so far have been "channel" model is not suitable for the new television. It will probably be un-ducted - such as today's is very

No comments:

Post a Comment