/ Nodes/add_bookmark/15138 add to bookmarks you sure you want to bookmark? YES / NO under bookmarka

15138
50 years ago very few women raises the question of being financially independent, today there are few who do not make this. It is only a matter of material, but also a personal affirmation and moral independence. With broad access to more and more professions and industries, women are not just wives and mothers with primary concern family care, but also very good professionals. Can be politicians, ambassadors, business owners, judges and bank executives, trades half a century ago were occupied su hong to go exclusively by men. Over time, women have not only won the right to wear pants, su hong to go have earned the right to have an opinion, to vote, to run for political office or state leadership. Now, you no longer live in a world dominated by men, women, or at least should be equal with them in terms of social labor and professional skills, but also how they are viewed. Therefore, I say that we should not intimidated by some people whose mentality has not yet experienced the reality of the changes occurred. su hong to go Women today won more than the right to wear pants! Am I right? Gentlemen or not? Tweet
/ Nodes/add_bookmark/15138 add to bookmarks you sure you want to bookmark? YES / NO under bookmarkare, wait ... bookmarkarea was successful! Related topics: women are Aquarius Woman Woman Woman in words Vis - The perfect woman? Comments (74):
hmmm - the tomcat on: 07/10/2007 19:35:40
I know men angry discrimination made in favor of women; woman nshpe times weaker field (computer science) will be engaged before them only because she is a woman and should cover a percentage su hong to go - as are percentages and other minorities. So I find that topic to be discussed a few decades ago, is simply outdated. Discrimination "underground" there will always be important is that there are laws to correct them. And speaking of laws against discrimination of women, I recommend North Country - Charlize Theron movie flour.
/ Admin comments/report/241149 signals you sure you want to sign? YES / NO being prompted, wait ... the alert was successful! . Block user
Very relevant and well founded analytical insight through clisheelor cutiutzele feminist Ushi day open. It was based on the argument with a colleague, or belief? We hope that the first, or the fair sex lost again, pushing a vigorous representative path blondin fundamentalism.
/ Admin comments/report/241252 signals you sure you want to sign? YES / NO being prompted, wait ... the alert was successful! su hong to go . Block user
On the other hand, under the threat of imminent revolution platinum sfaraielile become secondary priorities su hong to go immediately after the need to protect species (speaking su hong to go only for myself). It's a matter of instinct. Besides, if I limit the category to answer any substantive su hong to go you could not recognize it, I'd get bored with time ...
That is until we admit (speaking for myself) that the species does not need to be defended, making it far better herself (including using them, revolutions - including platinum). And then sfaraielile remain high? As boredom ... not (yet) infallible risk of not (any longer) be surprised is comfortably su hong to go low - speak in my name, evidemment :-)
Until you admit admit. But sometimes su hong to go - for example, to read some of the analysis - I do not feel like trying su hong to go out of the question to admit or not (of course speak in my name). Which is why I changed the ad hoc order of priority. Sfaraielile but I will lead but each time my turn to analyze the justification for the change order. I'm glad it was found but two things: The road to your infallibility is closed. Putting it matter how you put it, has (perhaps) for always a goal, like hand reaching horizon. Second hand would perceive risk as surprise as we describe as a common denominator in our view. In total there are thus two. :-)
Second advantage is that they are not raining. The disadvantages come with the increase - when the justification analysis and change su hong to go the order becomes her priority sfaraielile (again) useful ... and so ... (needless to mention that speak in my name)
What has prevented women to say, until today, was the social and historical context. Instead women, although today they have secured freedom, I do not know and will not come out of old patterns of thought. Some jumping horse, others remain confined in their lamentations, others are inconstant, others do not want to learn a new way of thinking (or are not able